Browse > Home / Archive by category 'Fundraising'

| Subscribe via RSS

A Dream to Rebuild New Orleans: Young High School Teacher Raises Over $1 Million to Build a Field of Dreams in the 9th Ward

March 2nd, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in Fundraising

banner2Nearly 5 years after Hurricane Katrina decimated the city of New Orleans, the city is getting a boost of hope from a project started by a teacher at George Washington Carver High School.

Fresh out of college, the now 24 year-old Brian Bordainick joined Teach for America to help make a difference for kids growing up in the inner-city. When he showed up for his first day at G.W. Carver High School, he didn’t see a school – just eight trailers in the parking lot of an abandoned school.

Shortly after starting at G.W. Carver, Bordainick was asked to step in as the school’s athletic director – and become the youngest athletic director in Louisiana history. Hoping to help reshape a program that was once great (the football program won multiple district championships and has an alumni roster including NFL-great Marshall Faulk), Bordainick faced many challenges as the school did not have resources to support the program.

But as Bordainick began to piece together the program, he learned of an NFL grant program for $200,000 in matching grants to rebuild football facilities and decided to pursue the grant to build a state of the art football field and track for the 9th ward community – called “The 9th Ward Field of Dreams”. Throughout this process, Bordainick eventually found an architecture firm to provide a budget a rendering of the project, which proved to be slightly more than he had anticipated – $1.85 million dollars.

Although told by many that this was an impossible dream – Bordainick pushed forward with the 9th ward project and over the last year has raised over $1 million dollars, has garnered support from Nike, and even scored a feature for The 9th Ward Field of Dreams on ESPN. With just a little more help, The 9th Ward Field of Dreams will be built.

“Together we can prove that against formidable odds, a few people crazy enough to believe in their own power to create change can overcome a seemingly impossible challenge.” – www.9thwardfieldofdreams.com

Learn more about the 9th Ward story in the videos below, or text “DREAM” to 50555 to make a donation and help The 9th Ward Field of Dreams reach its goal of $1.85 million and bring hope to the city of New Orleans.

Anything is Possible from The Canary Collective on Vimeo.

Brian Bordainick Talk @ The Feast from Chris Schultz on Vimeo.

View Source

2 Simple Ways to Increase Your Online Giving

March 2nd, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in Fundraising

Several weeks ago I decided to feature a local nonprofit organization I worked with years ago for Twitter’s #CharityTuesday, thinking that I might be able to drive a few extra dollars their way.

So I paid a visit to their website to make a donation and copy the url.

I searched and searched for a way to give.  I knew that they had the capability because yours truly had set it up all those years ago.

After searching through several pages, I finally came across this paragraph at the bottom of one page:

If you would like to donate via the internet please go to www.JustGive.org or www.guidestar.org. Once on one of those sites you can just search for ORGANIZATION’S NAME. You will then be lead to our donation page.

Folks I couldn’t make this stuff up.

Aaugh!

One of the first rules of thumb is to make it EASY TO GIVE.

If you’ve been in the field of nonprofit fundraising as long as I have – particularly if you’ve been working with smaller organizations – you may well recall the time when boards argued endlessly about whether or not their organization should even have a website.

Ahem.

According to the 2009 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study, while 2008 certainly wasn’t a red-letter year for fundraising in general, even in today’s tight economic times, nonprofit organizations showed a 43% increase in online gifts.  In fact, the total amount of money raised online increased 26% from 2007 to 2008.  Further, studies show that about half of those who receive your appeal for funds in the mail will go first to your website (the same holds true for that program officer reviewing your grant proposal, by the way).

It goes without saying that your organization should be collecting email addresses (my newsletter, The Grow Report, recently featured  simple, step-by-step instructions for setting up your web-site’s email opt-in box and systematizing your email newsletters). donatenow

Now, optimize your website for online giving by following these two simple rules:

  1. Make giving an online donation as easy as possible.  Include a conspicuous “Donate” button on every page of your site.  Yes, conspicuous.  Yes, every page.
  2. Include a hyperlink “Donate” button on every email sent out by every staff member within the signature line (and what’s to say you can’t request that your board do the same?).

Yes, I know you’re swamped.  Yes, I know your resources are limited.  Yes, I know that there’s more to online giving than these two steps.  Confucius say:  “A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.”

View Source

Exciting Partnership Includes Student Support, Municipal Government Grant and Private Philanthropy

March 2nd, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in Fundraising

100209athleticsTrent University’s new Community Sport and Recreation Centre is being bolstered by the City of Peterborough’s decision to invest $1-million into the facility’s construction.

The facility, which includes a strong commitment towards community use, fulfills the objectives contained in the City’s Vision 2010 Strategic Plan for Recreation, Parks and Culture by designating the Trent Community Sport and Recreation Centre as the third recreation centre serving the residents of the City.

Trent students have also contributed significantly to the project by previously approving a multi-year, $50 levy per student.

The $16 million expanded and renovated complex will serve the needs of the disabled, seniors, families, community sports teams, and Trent varsity athletes and intramural programs. With its Silver LEED designation, the new building will be an additional green asset for the University and City, and serve as a magnet to attract national and international sporting events.

eatures of the expanded complex include:

* Fitness centre
* Swimming pool retrofit
* Family/disabled change room
* Men’s and women’s change room upgrades
* Team change room
* Therapy pool
* Indoor rowing/paddling tank
* Climbing wall
* International competitive squash court
* Clinic for Health Excellence
* Multipurpose room
* Flexible classroom space
* Improved access to stadium, river and facilities
* Outdoor pavilion
* Respectful integration of the natural environment into recreational programs
* All inclusive memberships

The economic activity flowing from these events will generate the purchase of related goods and services, thereby stimulating the local economy. The building activity which is well underway, is a combination of new construction and renovations and will result in 180 plus jobs across different trades. The new facility is also slated to be the host venue for the Canadian Interuniversity Sport (CIS) national Women’s Rugby Championships in 2010 and 2011.

Some of the latest construction highlights include:

* Structural steel installation – 98 per cent compete
* Roof decking – being installed
* Electrical system installed and operational
* Block wall supporting the climbing wall – under construction
* Therapy tank foundations are being poured
* New insulation – being installed on the River side of the building
* Preparations for installation of copper cladding
* Sprinkler systems – being installed
* Glass curtain wall – installation beginning in February
* New Cardio equipment – February

To support the project, a community wide team of nearly 100 volunteers are working together with campaign Co-Chairs Dr. Peter Adams and Mr. Gary Wolff, to raise $4-million towards the project. To learn more about the campaign and how you can participate, please visit: http://www.trentu.ca/athleticscampaign/.

View Source

Haiti And The Rest Of Us: What’s Next For Non-Disaster Charities?

February 18th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in Fundraising

Seventy million dollars and counting. That’s how much money the Canadian arms of three major aid charities (Médecins sans frontières, the Red Cross and World Vision) raised for Haitian relief work by January 25. Other international relief and development charities report unprecedented results as well. The Salvation Army received $120,000 in just a few days in its first ever text messaging campaign. The backroom technology that made it possible comes from the Mobile Giving Foundation.

Bandwagon unites private and public enterprise

Private enterprise and even some government corporations aren’t far behind. The Liquor Control Board of Ontario brought in $126,000 in one week for the Red Cross by asking for $2 at the cash register. Air Miles encourages people to donate points. Benefit concerts, bake sales, fundraising walks, classroom campaigns and Facebook pages abound. And then there are the endorsements from celebrities: Celine DionNelly FurtadoMichael J. Fox and Donovan Bailey, to name just a few.

janet_1In the U.S. the House of Representatives unanimously approved a bill allowing donors to Haitian relief to claim their gift on their 2009 tax return. (The Ministère des Finances in Québec announced a similar measure January 22.) “Are they saying that feeding and sheltering America’s growing population of hungry and homeless, caring for our nation’s sick or preventing life-threatening diseases is any less noble than the relief efforts in Haiti?” Greg Fox wrote on DonorPower.com in response to the U.S. action.

Right now we may feel like asking our media the same question.

2004 tsunami didn’t impede regular campaigns

What does all this mean for your charity’s prospects in 2010? We can look to the 2004 tsunami for clues. Arguably, that disaster occurred at a time when it might have had the greatest possible effect on overall fundraising – the crucial last week of opportunity for catch-up giving, scrambling procrastinators and tax-savvy donors. Yet the Association of Fundraising Professionals reported that in both Canada and the U.S., nearly two-thirds of nonprofits raised more money in 2004 than in the previous year (Canadian Fundraiser, August 31, 2005).

That’s good news for the rest of us. Add to that the fact that the generous response to the Haitian catastrophe occurs at the beginning of a new year of giving, that the economy seems to be recovering (for the time being anyway), and that the sector is more skilled and professional than it was in December 2004, and there may be no reason to tinker with the goals and budgets we’ve established.

Communicating our case

How, then, do we conduct ourselves as representatives of charities not relieving such dramatic need? Above all, says communications expert Nancy Schwartz, acknowledge it. “Pretending the disasters didn’t happen is the worst mistake your organization can make,” she advises.

It’s time for sensitive communication. You may actually go as far as to acknowledge the impact of the earthquake and the contributions your donors and prospects are likely to have made, she counsels. In doing so, you create the opportunity to talk about your issues and the resulting needs that persist even in the face of the Haitian tragedy.

Don’t overstate a connection between your organization, services or programs and the disaster, Schwartz warns. Continue your regular media campaigns and press releases, and if your pitch is timely, continue to make it.

Direct mail consultants differ on the immediate impact of the Haitian fundraising efforts. Lisa M. Deitlin told The Chronicle of Philanthropy that she recommended delaying direct mail fundraising appeals for a few weeks if possible. But Canada’s Fraser Green contends that the vast majority of disaster donors are not regular donors to charities in general. Since most of his clients see their greatest returns on the first renewal campaign of the year, usually held in January, he warns against delaying that first critical mailing too much.

Making the most of opportunities

Media coverage of a calamity inevitably declines as new news emerges. In Canada, the Olympics are just one of the stories waiting to crowd the devastating situation of Haitians off our news sites, front pages and airwaves. It’s not fair, but it is predictable.

Let us encourage the organizations engaged in Haitian relief to make the most of their limited time in the spotlight. Your solid communications plan, compelling case and knowledge of your audiences will have their usual effect in due time. We will all benefit from media attention to the many ways of giving, both old and new. Above all, we will benefit from the media’s celebration of generosity – the real good news in the midst of this tragic tale.

View Source Here

Email and Fundraising

February 18th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in Fundraising

Sending email to thousands, indeed millions, of recipients has become common for for-profit business and non-profits organizations.  A few things to consider when deciding how important an email strategy is for your organization and its constituency follow:

1. How current are your records?  Do you have emails on 25% of your donors and prospects email addresses?  If so, you have a good starting point.  If you’re short on addresses in your database, you may want to consider email appending and other strategies to enhance your data.

2. How large is your audience?  Are you trying to reach a few hundred people or many thousands of prospects and past supporters?  With small counts, only email campaigns make the use of color and other exciting visuals possible. With larger audiences, the savings associated with email campaigns relative to direct mail campaigns are enormous.

3. How effective are you at reaching your base through direct mail, by phone and in person?  Should you use all mean available to cultivate and prospect and steward donors?  Because your constituents can receive email any time, and because its use is ubiquitous, effective use of email can only assist use of the more traditional methods.  Email campaigns can stand independently or lift response supporting other appeals.

4. How can direct mail, phonathons and personal visits help you enhance your efforts related to social networking?  Can all three techniques combined, do as much as either email or text messaging independently?  No, they cannot.  The immediacy of data and subscription links within email and text messages make these services stand above more traditional solicitation techniques because we can control and promote our social networks.  I will encourage text message marketing in future issues of this publication.

5. Email marketing can boost your existing efforts.  It likely deserves a higher percentage of your current resources than it receives.  Its relationship to social networking means that the longer you wait to fully engage in email marketing, the further behind you are relatively to your peers and competitors.

If you would like to talk about ideas you have regarding the use email in your work, please drop me at an email at brian@brianlacy.com or giving me a call at (860) 478-9291.  Lots of my best ideas are free for the taking.

Sincerely,

Brian

Rethinking Ways to Give Wisely

February 18th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in Fundraising

As a new generation of donors seeks greater accountability from not-for-profits, advisers are seeking new ways to gauge the good an organization accomplishes

By Amy Feldman

Individuals in the U.S. give away more than $200 billion a year, yet the vast majority of those decisions are made ad hoc.Few donors have any idea whether they are giving to the best organization in the area they want to improve, or even whether their giving is doing what they want it to do.A slew of nascent efforts to rate and grade charities, as well as the pending overhaul of the big kahuna of nonprofit ratings groups, Charity Navigator, may change all that.

At least a half-dozen groups have come up with different answers to the question of how to help donors make good decisions. In addition to Charity Navigator, these online efforts include GiveWell, Philanthropedia, and GreatNonprofits. In addition, GuideStar, which serves as a clearinghouse of data and information on nonprofits, has begun adding some of these rating efforts to its site.Offline, two new efforts—from Root Cause and Partners for Change Initiative—are working to get information into the hands of financial advisers as they struggle with how to help their clients make giving decisions.

Not all of these efforts are new, but philanthropy experts say that they have begun to reach critical mass, and that the proliferation of different approaches to the same question will ultimately be good for both donors and nonprofits. “There is a mindset shift going on in philanthropy,” says Sean Stannard-Stockton, chief executive of Tactical Philanthropy Advisors, an advisory firm to high-net-worth donors based in Burlingame, Calif. “People want to know that their money is actually making a difference.”

That’s especially true in the current economic downturn. Donors have less money to give, while charities need more cash to provide services to more people in need. The result is more donors who want to know that the money they do give makes a difference, and not-for-profits taking more steps to show their results. But the longer-term trend predates the recession. Baby boomers have become used to getting advice on their finances, yet there are few places to turn for philanthropic advice for those giving less than $1 million. While increasing numbers of people have set up donor-advised funds, which can be a smart financial-planning move, these vehicles don’t answer the question of where to give the money for greatest effect.

Washington is also playing a role in the mindset shift. The Internal Revenue Service did a massive overhaul of the Form 990 that not-for-profit organizations must file—the biggest such change to the form in three decades—requiring lots of new information on governance questions. Meanwhile, the Obama Administration has set up the Social Innovation Fund, which is slated to invest $50 million this fiscal year in bringing innovative nonprofits up to scale.

“There is a lot of energy around this right now,” says Laura Callanan, a philanthropy expert at McKinsey & Co. “Social impact assessment is the holy grail for people doing philanthropy and nonprofit work. How do you know what works and why? And how do you know that money is making a difference in people’s lives?”
Calculating Social Impact

As with any new benchmarking effort, figuring out whether a charity is effective at what it does is not so simple.

After all, a homeless shelter, international relief organization, or other philanthropy is not a business; its social impact needs to be evaluated on different criteria than profit and loss and the true impact of its programs may not be clear for years to come. Plus, doing an in-depth analysis may be too expensive for many small not-for-profits that are already stretched for funds.

The recent devastating earthquake in Haiti, and the outpouring of requests for help, shows many of the difficulties facing donors in making a philanthropic decision. Would it be better to give to the American Red Cross, which lets you text a small donation? Or to Doctors Without Borders, which is working to help those injured in the quake despite damage to its own medical facilities? Or to a smaller group on the ground that has less name recognition here? Which group will make the most difference in that impoverished country over the long term?

“We as Americans like to do things immediately,” says GuideStar President Bob Ottenhoff. “But a lot of the problems in Haiti, they have been experiencing for years or for decades. We learned this from Hurricane Katrina—the initial surge of support isn’t sufficient.”

For donors, then, the best approach is to think about your philanthropic giving more along the lines of how you view your investment portfolio. That means thinking through the big questions first (what matters to you?), and then drilling down to those groups that are doing the best work. The new rating efforts take different approaches to answering the second part of that.

GiveWell, launched in 2007, offers rigorous Wall Street-like research on nearly 400 charities, in which it tries to determine how effective they are. Few charities have enough data or analysis to provide such proof, and GiveWell only recommends those that can. “The charity needs to do a lot of analysis on its own,” says GiveWell co-founder Holden Karnofsky. “It sounds like common sense, but it is also the most difficult question to answer.” The upshot: GiveWell recommends just nine charities.

Root Cause has begun doing similar research reports, though geared toward financial advisers. Its first batch of research covers educational groups in Massachusetts. GreatNonprofits, also started in 2007, allows donors, volunteers, and social-service recipients to write reviews à la TripAdvisor or Yelp; it currently has reviews of some 3,000 not-for-profits.
Portfolios of Not-for-Profits

Philanthropedia, which recently launched, garners the opinions of experts in different sectors and creates what it calls “expert mutual funds,” portfolios of not-for-profits in areas such as climate change or microfinance with a dozen or so holdings in each. Partners for Change is also working up a mutual-fund-like approach, though its concept will mimic the portfolios of successful foundations in certain areas. Executive Director Jim Litwin says that he expects to launch in the summer, so that advisers will be prepared to roll out the offerings to clients in the fall giving season. Litwin hopes that by targeting advisers, rather than individuals directly, he will be able to reach donors with $10,000 or more to give, rather than the smaller amounts that many give online. As Litwin says: “These foundations have already done all the work on what the most effective organizations are, so why can’t you leverage that knowledge of where to give?”

Consider how Charity Navigator is rethinking its star rating system under the direction of Ken Berger, its executive director since June 2008. With star ratings on 5,500 charities and some 4 million hits to the site each year, Charity Navigator is the biggest of the online philanthropy rating agencies, and sets the tone for how individuals think about their giving. From its 2001 founding until recently, however, it had rated charities largely on financial benchmarks—and given them high marks for low overhead, a metric that academic research now shows is not that helpful in evaluating a nonprofit’s work. The new star system, which will still go from zero to four stars, will include measures of financial strength, accountability, and effectiveness. Berger says he hopes to roll out the new ratings in the spring of 2011, with additional information appearing between now and then. “The core concept is to look at this as a social investment, like a stock with a certain level of risk,” Berger says. “So the rating we are looking to develop revolves around risk—what is the level of risk that you as a donor are willing to take on?”

The bigger question—and ultimately the bigger opportunity—is how these new efforts to rate charities and to influence donors’ decisions will impact the way that philanthropies themselves operate. The hope among those who are launching these efforts is that if not-for-profits knew that their programs weren’t working that well, they would revamp them based on that information. Also, if more of that $200 billion ends up going to the most effective charities, it could push the least effective ones to rethink what they’re doing. “We’re starting to see a shakeout now,” says Nancy Kelly, an accountant at the Metis Group, who has focused on not-for-profits for 25 years. “You’re seeing more competition for dollars and more merger activity than in the past 15 years. It is forcing nonprofits to look at their operations like a business.”

View Source Here

Pockets of Philanthropy

February 18th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in Fundraising

by Terry Burton

2009 will be a memorable year in nonprofit history. The national trends according to most media sources suggested that giving was down everywhere and that the sector was suffering a collective tragedy.

Not so.

Pockets of philanthropy thrived in a number of communities as if immune to the financial troubles. As the pages of history for 2009 came and went, the good news, the outstanding news of philanthropic joy burst through the curtain of despair and shone brightly.

The national trends I followed suggested that the number of gifts were down but the dollar amount of the gifts received was higher than in recent years. Isn’t that interesting?

Here are some examples of the Good News headlines I noticed in 2009:

Western Kentucky University announced record breaking giving
for the second half of 2009

New York Opera gala event tallied the largest giving ever to the event

Milwaukee United Way surpassed fundraising goal

North Carolina nonprofits doing well despite recession

Boys Scouts USA receive largest gift ever, $50 million

University of California, Santa Barbara $40 million in fundraising

University of Indiana raised a record $221.4 million in latest fiscal year

St. Paul’s School for Girls in Baltimore, reported $1 million gift, largest ever

Community Health Network, Indiana, received largest gift ever, $1 million

University of Minnesota reported the second best ever year on record for giving

Condell Hospital, Chicago, received largest gift ever, $1 million

University of Kansas set record in number of gifts and pledges

Cazenovia College received largest gift ever, $2 million

University of Michigan, Dearborn received largest alumni gift ever of $2 million

Higher education remains the key sector of the nonprofit community. The notion of the Pockets of Philanthropy can be seen in the collection of GOOD NEWS announcements. And these do not include the surprise gifts and estate announcements that brought smiles to many fundraising teams.

2009 was a difficult year. Economic indicators just published in the last week of January 2010 report GNP was up over 4.75% for the last quarter of 2009, far ahead of projections. Momentum is building, more people are working and more jobs are being created. 2010 is already buzzing with big gifts.

This report is a part of my new publication: Survey of Major Gifts & Philanthropy – 2009, coming in February 2010.

For more information please contact Terry Burton at Dig In Research
Web site: http://diginresearch.biz Telephone:  248-438-8064  Email: tburton@diginresearch.biz

25 Ways to Improve Your Direct Mail

February 18th, 2010 | 1 Comment | Posted in Fundraising

1. Write the call to action before you do anything else. It’s very un-Zen to say it, but fundraising is more about the destination than the journey. You’re going to arrive a lot more successfully when you know exactly where you’re going.

2. Think of 25 reasons why a donor should give to you. Then, get rid of all the reasons that are about you and not the donor.

3. Ask, “How would The National Enquirer write this?” The Enquirer knows the value of the amazing, the lurid, the outrageous, the unexpected — and it milks it. Are you doing that, or are you imitating “respectable” journalism, purposely keeping it as colorless and purely factual as possible? Guess which approach gets more readership — and raises more funds.

4. Ignore your brand guidelines. Your brand guidelines are meant to sharpen and define your message and make it consistent. But there’s a fatal flaw: The guidelines are all about you, not about your donors. They’re all about self-?focused communication, and that will hurt your fundraising. How can I say that, never having seen your brand guidelines? I’ve read a lot of nonprofit brand documents and not yet have seen one that’s nontoxic to fundraising.

5. Show, don’t tell. You’ve heard this in every creative-writing class you’ve ever taken. It’s good advice. It’s easy to assert that something is sad, or great, or special, or cutting-edge. It’s more persuasive to give the facts that add up to those things.

6. Overdo it. Be too dramatic. Too emotional. Too strong. Eight times out of 10, you’ll realize later that you didn’t overdo it at all. The other two times — well, it’s a lot easier to tone it down than it is to pump up weak and underdone copy.

7. Use your data. You know quite a bit about the people you’re writing to — their names, their cities, what and when they’ve given, and more. Use these facts to make your copy more personal and relevant. Just make sure you don’t sound awkward and robotic.

8. Flunk your English teachers. They meant well and taught you many useful things, but not everything they taught was useful. Paragraphs don’t have to start with topic sentences. Passive voice is not all that bad. Neither are sentence fragments.

9. Repeat yourself. Whatever it is that you want people to do, tell them that thing again and again and again. Repeat yourself because you don’t know if they ?understood or even noticed it the first and second ?times. Repeat yourself because hardly anyone ?starts at the beginning and reads straight through to the end.

10. Annoy yourself. You are not your donor. That’s one of the most important truths you can know, and it has a dramatic side effect: Messages that motivate donors very often will turn you off. Learn to make your own distaste a good barometer for effective fundraising.

11. Use a cliché or two. There’s a reason clichés catch on. They express things that people often want to express — in short (and sweet) ways that are easy (as pie) to remember. Fundraising isn’t creative-writing class; you aren’t going to lose points for lack of ?originality. However, you will get extra credit for motivating more people to give.

12. Use fewer adjectives and adverbs. If your nouns and verbs aren’t doing the job, adjectives and adverbs are not going to pick up the slack. Well-placed ?modifiers can add zing. But most of the time, they just make the copy harder to read — and make you sound like a huckster.

13. Omit huge numbers. Donors don’t want to solve a problem because it’s big. They want to solve it because it’s solvable. Yes, 24,000 children die from hunger-?related causes every day. That’s a mind-boggling fact. The fact that it’s mind-boggling is exactly why it’s a poor fundraising platform. Give donors the opportunity to save one life, and then another and another.

14. Use wrong grammar. I’m not suggesting you be churlish and deliberately make stupid mistakes. But sometimes getting it right makes you come across as a schoolmarm, which, unless you’re an actual schoolmarm, is pretty unsympathetic. For instance, correct use of “whom” doesn’t sound natural to most people (and it’s probably dropping out of English). Any correct grammar that people don’t commonly use in speech is a candidate for flouting. And if that’s too painful, just revise so you avoid the issue.

15. Replace at least one paragraph that’s about you. Instead, make it one that is about your reader.

16. Limit paragraphs to seven lines. Long paragraphs are forbidden territory. Anything more than seven lines is long. Most paragraphs should be one to four lines.

17. Break up long sentences. Long sentences are the main cause of thick, unreadable prose. Any sentence more than 20 words is probably too long. Keep ?sentences closer to 10 words. Or less. Really.

18. Read your copy out loud. This is one of the best ways to make sure your copy is clear, colloquial and easy to read. If you stumble while reading, sound pompous or arrogant, or just come across as an idiot, your copy needs more work.

19. Cut your first paragraph. I’m not kidding. It’s like magic. Most likely, your first paragraph is a warm-up — and your real lead is your second or even third paragraph. Give it a try. It’s one of the quickest and most surefire copy revisions I know.

20. Make the letter longer. I know you wouldn’t read a long letter. Neither would I. For all we know, nobody reads long letters anymore. But we do know long letters work. Every time I’ve tested this (except once a few years ago), longer letters worked better than shorter ones. Add another page, and you’ll almost surely get more response.

21. Use photos sparingly — but use them. They say a picture is worth a thousand words (personally, I think it’s more like 600). So use those pictures carefully. Too often we use photos that might as well be saying ?”lobster” a thousand times. Make sure the photos you use tell the same story as the words you write.

22. Underline stuff. And use bold. And italics. Emphasis and variation are great for readability. Just don’t overdo it, because too much emphasis turns out to be no emphasis at all.

23. Use black serif type over a white background. Any variation from this — sans-serif type, white type over color, even black type over a tint, colored type — will degrade the reading comprehension of your donors. This advice will make some designers very unhappy, but it’s a simple reality.

24. Use 13-point type for body copy. Hey, your donors wear bifocals. Almost every one of them. Would you rather be part of their daily struggle to read small type or a strain-free oasis in their day? Which choice do you think will make them more likely to respond?

25. Bypass most of your reviewers. Committees kill fundraising, systematically draining life and power from anything they touch, while bulking up the ?message with irrelevancies and worse. That’s just ?the way committees are. Work without committees, and you’ll see improvements — to your copy and ?your revenue.

View Source Here

Silent Auction Planning

January 23rd, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in Fundraising, Uncategorized

Careful Planning Ensures Silent Auction Success
By Valarie Minetos

A silent auction’s success hinges on organized, thoughtful planning balanced with an organization’s available resources. In organizing a silent auction, it is critical to assess and determine specific goals from top to bottom.

Have a road map
If you previously held a silent auction, review your results to identify the areas you would like to improve. It this is your first silent auction, be realistic in setting your goals. Once financial goals are defined, consider the ‘soft’ goals. How can your organization’s prestige and profile be enhanced? Are you using staff and volunteers appropriately? How will you recognize donors? Human resource allocation, data, project and time management are all key elements in making your event a success.

Managing volunteers
The chairperson’s role should be that of a manager, focusing on the overall process and delegating resposibilities. Individual strengths and talents should be assessed to recruit the right volunteer for each job. Computer skills, creativity and project management experience are a few of the talents you might look for in your staff and volunteer pool. Ideally, your key volunteers will groom an eventual replacement, so that each person taking an important job will already be familiar with it and with your organization.

Technology tip
A variety of great auction software is now available that can help organize and centralize many tasks and even reduce the number of volunteers needed. Some software packages will enable you to create event materials such as item display signs, live auction bid paddles, an auction catalo, and certificates. Other capabilities might include table assignments, management of ticket sales, reports for event statistics and automated printing of mailing lists, mailing labels and nametags. Do your homework to find out which auction software is best for you and your organization.

Avoiding common pitfalls
Typically, there are two points during a silent auction that will make or break its success. Both points involve information management and processing.

Registration- Effective communication is the key to a smooth registration process. Guests should be told ahead of time about the check-in procedure: Is it by the guest’s last name? By host’s name? Bye the name of their company? You’ll need to establish your policy on ticket purchases at the door and communicate it to potential attendees in your pre-event materials. You should clearly communicate when the auction closes and how the closing will be announced. Be sure to gather credit cared and contact information during registration, otherwise it may be impossible to track down winning bidders who leave the event without checking out.

Checkout- Too often, a chaotic checkout process can spoil what had been an otherwise flawless event. Be sure to schedule plenty of time between the close of the auction and the checkout so you can identify high bidders and prepare invoices for pick-up. Use plenty of volunteers to process guests efficiently and match them with their items. Remember, the checkout is the last impression that guests will have of your silent auction and of your organization!

Valarie Minetos manages sales and marketing for AuctionStar® software package.  For information, visit website www.BarcodedAuctions.com , or call (713) 665-1231.

February Webinars

January 19th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in Annual Giving, Fundraising

Feb. 2    Running Your Annual Fund with Less Resources

Brian Kish, Asst. VP for Advancement at Salve Regina University

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/763776683

 

Feb. 10   Direct Mail – Get what you ask for!

Scott VanDeusen, Exec. Director of Advancement Programs at St. John’s University

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/944683523

 

Feb. 11    Twitter Your Way to Contributiions

Don Philabaum, President at Internet Strategies Group

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/828464634

 

Feb. 16    Understanding Annual Giving’s Role as a Funnel for Major Gifts

Brian Kish, Asst. VP for Advancement at Salve Regina University

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/112520459

 

Feb. 17   Maximizing the Impact of Your Phonathon

Brian Kish, Asst. VP for Advancement at Salve Regina University

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/352016499

 

Feb. 23   International Prospect Identification and Research

Debbie Miller, Consultant and Presenter at Debbie Miller and Associates

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/915037291

 

Feb. 24    Integrating Alumni and Annual Giving Messaging

Scott VanDeusen, Exec. Director of Advancement Programs at St. John’s University

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/738749642

 

Feb. 25    Increase in Registrations in Your Online Community

Don Philabaum, President at Internet Strategies Group

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/850157034